
Originally Posted by
A K Church
I ended up with two. a 1915 and a 1944. Both went away.
The plus points as I see them:
They have seen a lot of turbulent history.
They are in interesting piece mechanically in that they do a lot with a few low stressed parts.
Most relevantly for most people, they don't usually cost much.
The consensus of folks who shoot them is they are not prone to breakage.
The minus points:
Trigger pulls are a plumb booger in both modes. The hammer movement is powering the whole forward movement of the cylinder and standing breech.
The grip is lousy. Close to Broomhandle lousy.
The sights are lousy. On neither of mine were they regulated close to the commercial Fiocchi ammo. Picture a Gewehr 98 front sight on a revolver with a Single Action Army rear sight. Apparently they were designed to not break, instead of designed to actually hit things.
Ammo is scarce and frighteningly expensive when you find it. Now and then dribbles of Soviet stuff have shown up, but generally it's Fiocchi-I think I paid over $35 a box for it in the '90s. Commercial auxiliary cylinders don't provide the gas seal, and the .32ACP or .32SWL bullets often have diameter issues with Nagant barrels.
Gunsmiths would rather not work on these, and most never have.
Loading/unloading is glacially slow. No, slower than that. Considering it replaced a truly great breakopen S&W revolver, or good copies of same, this is impossible for me to wrap my head around.
They don't break much apparently, but some parts, especially grips, are scarce...or were last I looked for them.
Bookmarks