rbinhood
Bushmaster
We can agree that we aren't going to agree on most anything. Let's leave it at that.Trump didn't bomb a school, nor did he order the bombing of a school.
We can agree that we aren't going to agree on most anything. Let's leave it at that.Trump didn't bomb a school, nor did he order the bombing of a school.
That's fine. But facts are facts. Anyone see Trump sitting behind the controls on a B2 or B52, setting the GPS coordinates and then pushing the button in the CIC on a DDG? Obviously not, because it didn't happen. The exact targets chosen are done at the CENTCOM level, and we both know there was no order to target a school.We can agree that we aren't going to agree on most anything. Let's leave it at that.
I don't know that. If you have the targeting directives for our cruise missile that destroyed the school and killed the people in it, please post them? If you don't have that information, then you don't know who ordered it or how the order read. Who ordered it and how the order read are facts, the same facts you claim are so desperately lacking elsewhere. We are talking about a person who just recently threatened to wipe the entire Iranian civilization off the face of the earth (Fact-He posted it on his Truth Social). While I agree there are some despotic people in Iran, I also think there are many good people in Iran who would be killed if all of the people in Iran were killed. Killing an entire populace is called genocide and it is a war crime under the Geneva Convention. Duterte ordered the killing of thousands of people in the Philippines and thought he could get away with it until he was arrested under a warrant issued by the International Criminal Court in the Hague. He now will stand trial for his crimes. Some people in the current regime in the U.S. may eventually find themselves subject to a similar fate. The Commander in Chief can't run from the responsibility of being Commander in Chief because the responsibility for what happens in the war that he started (without congressional approval) ultimately goes uphill. Eventually the dust from this charade will finally settle. I'm going to wait to see what happens when the Fat Lady finally sings.we both know there was no order to target a school.
No, the 1st-gen Volt was an EREV... an electric vehicle with an onboard generator. The gas-powered engine was only for the generator and did not have a mechanical connection to the drivetrain.
I think this is a best-of-both-worlds approach... for around-town trips you have an EV, for longer trips you have a gas-powered vehicle.
The school was bombed, either negligently or by chance, but it was bombed by our side. About 100-200 children were killed. Not owning up to that or acknowledging this fact is both cowardly and inexcusable… Turd polishing this atrocity groups you into it.Trump didn't bomb a school, nor did he order the bombing of a school. Why the Iranians put a public school inside the confines of a military base, after repurposing the building, is obvious... they are willing to put their children up as shields. Just like they were recruiting women and children to literally surround power plants and link hands, using them as hostages to prevent US action. Just like they are willing to pay their proxies (Houthis, Hamas, Hezbollah) to target women and children to extort action from Israel, the US, and the West in general.
The Islamic Republic of Iran 'leaders' are the worst sort of criminals and cowards, and more of them need to be sent to Allah in order to resolve this, to free the Iranian people, and remove the pit of vipers that is the source of world terrorism.
If you have targeting directives-orders that show the school was intentionally targeted by the USA please post that.If you have the targeting directives for our cruise missile that destroyed the school and killed the people in it, please post them?
Does it really matter where Iran knowingly puts its own civilian schools (within a military base/complex, as far as I can tell) and uses their deaths to put the US and Israel in a negative light, when the Iranian Republic Guard Corps and their militias have killed anywhere from 6,480 to upwards of 36,000 Iranian civilians for protesting?The school was bombed, either negligently or by chance, but it was bombed by our side. About 100-200 children were killed. Not owning up to that or acknowledging this fact is both cowardly and inexcusable… Turd polishing this atrocity groups you into it.
Can you clarify your rationale? You seem to care about protester deaths, but not school children. Shouldn’t you care about both?Does it really matter where Iran knowingly puts its own civilian schools (within a military base/complex, as far as I can tell) and uses their deaths to put the US and Israel in a negative light, when the Iranian Republic Guard Corps and their militias have killed anywhere from 6,480 to upwards of 36,000 Iranian civilians for protesting?
And in keeping with the thread; gas is holding steady at $4.49 at my preferred station in Albany, Oregon..with Costco still at $4.45 and other places $4.59 or more. No signs of price reductions even though oil prices are coming down.
Why should one care about either, if the goal is to make sure Trump loses?Can you clarify your rationale? You seem to care about protester deaths, but not school children. Shouldn’t you care about both?
You’re doing a lot of political whining. You seem to forget that the Republicans have the WH, House, and the Senate.. and the SC. Pretending to be a political victim isn’t a strong position for Republicans. It’s a weak look.Why should one care about either, if the goal is to make sure Trump loses?
If the goal is to stop the IRGC and liberate the people, why are politicians preventing going all in, on war, to completely destroy the political power and military power of the Islamic Republic?
To be sure, yes I'd rather far fewer civilian deaths, but when the Iranian regime have no problem with using civilians as shields and killing their own people just to stay in power.... Then it seems total war really is the only answer and the US and Israel should toughen up and accept that there will be civilian casualties regardless of how clean the targets should be.
Honestly.... The Iranian massacres should be a clear signal that the regime isn't going down any other way except complete annihilation, and that the media and rest of the world should just shut up and let the US and Israel finish the job. But clearly that ain't gonna happen.
So. Blame and hope Trump lose for a missile that struck a human shield, or accept that it's war and these things happen, and go all in on defeating, annihilating the regime in power there? Or just stop short and let that regime rebuild and come back stronger, for another 40 years of jihad against the US? I know which way I'd prefer.


That's not my burden. I made the true statement that I didn't know what was targeted or who gave the order. I think the fact the U.S. bombed a school as part of a war he gave the ok for is beyond dispute.If you have targeting directives-orders that show the school was intentionally targeted by the USA please post that.
That is funny stuff. Tds is your burden and actual truth is not within your grasp.That's not my burden. I made the true statement that I didn't know what was targeted or who gave the order. I think the fact the U.S. bombed a school as part of a war he gave the ok for is beyond dispute.
I know you’re only a few weeks into membership, according to your join date, but political name calling isn’t tolerated well here. It generally ends with the member being banned and/or a thread being shut down. Much better places on the Internet for that kind of thing.That is funny stuff. Tds is your burden and actual truth is not within your grasp.
Thank you for the advice. It is difficult to avoid responding to someone who quotes me and turns the very positive thing of the potus effectively saving 8 women from being executed with lies about the potus. Then hiding behind some bizarre rational.I know you’re only a few weeks into membership, according to your join date, but political name calling isn’t tolerated well here. It generally ends with the member being banned and/or a thread being shut down. Much better places on the Internet for that kind of thing.
The school was supposedly hit by a Tomahawk cruise missile. There is uncertainty if it was hit by a cruise missile or a malfunctioning Iranian SAM, and if hit by a US cruise missile if the missile was damaged by anti-air fire from Iranian forces... or if the building was a school or was recently repurposed. We do know that Trump did not personally instruct CENTCOM to target this particular bulding. We don't know, but we do know that we cannot take anything Iran says as factual without independent verification. BTW we know Biden personally approved the bombing of an innocent Afghan family after the attack at Abbey Gate during the Afghan withdrawal debacle that killed 10 innocent people... where was the outrage?The school was bombed, either negligently or by chance, but it was bombed by our side. About 100-200 children were killed. Not owning up to that or acknowledging this fact is both cowardly and inexcusable… Turd polishing this atrocity groups you into it.
1. International investigations point to the US being responsible for the Iran school bombing.The school was supposedly hit by a Tomahawk cruise missile. There is uncertainty if it was hit by a cruise missile or a malfunctioning Iranian SAM, and if hit by a US cruise missile if the missile was damaged by anti-air fire from Iranian forces... or if the building was a school or was recently repurposed. We do know that Trump did not personally instruct CENTCOM to target this particular bulding. We don't know, but we do know that we cannot take anything Iran says as factual without independent verification. BTW we know Biden personally approved the bombing of an innocent Afghan family after the attack at Abbey Gate during the Afghan withdrawal debacle that killed 10 innocent people... where was the outrage?
So, if it was accidentally hit, that's bad. But if so, this is not an atrocity, it's an accident of war. Unlike real atrocities, like the Iranian government murdering 20,000 to 40,000 of their own citizens earlier this year because they dared to protest. You see, we have all these "No Kings" protests here in the US and they work because we don't have a king here in the US. The last king we had massacred people for protesting and for standing up for their rights, back in Boston before 1776.
So, not accepting "facts" from Iranian officials is prudent, not cowardly or inexcusable. What's the word for always taking your country's adversaries' word over that of your own government? Or libeling a person who has been repeatedly investigsted but never charged, and in fact cleared, of the crimes that you accuse him of? And what responsibility do the people who continue to smear that person have for the repeated assassination attempts against him?